Buy a full case and the price per unit drops automaticallyRequest a sample
AccountCart0
All ContainersBottlesJarsCaps & ClosuresPumps & SprayersTubs & PailsJugsDroppersTinsTubesAccessories
Industries
Learn
What goes wrong

Do not decant contact lens solution

Updated

On this page9
This is the one leaf in the group where the honest answer is not to sell a bottle for it.

Why it is different

A contact lens care product is regulated as a medical device or a drug depending on what it is, and sterility is the property it is sold on. Pouring it into a bottle from a drawer is the specific act that ends that.

The bottle is not the problem

A travel bottle here is clean, not sterile, and nothing on this shelf is supplied sterile or could be made so by rinsing. Those are different standards with different processes behind them.

And the risk is to an eye

Which is why this page exists rather than a sizing note. A contaminated lens solution is a serious infection risk, and it is not a risk anyone should take to save carrying the original bottle.

The original packaging exists for a reason

It was filled under conditions that produced a sterile product and sealed to keep it that way. Manufacturers sell small original sizes precisely because decanting is not an acceptable substitute.

So buy the travel size the maker sells

Which is the whole advice. It is usually cheap, it is widely available, and it is the only version of this that keeps the property the product is for.

We would rather lose the sale

A customer looking for a bottle to decant lens solution into is a customer we should turn away, and saying so plainly costs us one small order and nothing else.

The same caution reaches anything sterile

Eye drops, wound care, anything described as sterile on its label. If sterility is part of what the product is, decanting ends it, and no closure or liner on this shelf changes that.

Clean and sterile are different words

A bottle rinsed with boiling water is clean. Sterile is the result of a validated process, and no domestic step reaches it. Treating the two as degrees of the same thing is the misunderstanding this page exists to correct.

References

29 CFR 1910.1200, Hazard Communication, which sets what a shipped container of a hazardous chemical carries and requires a safety data sheet. law.cornell.edu
49 CFR 175.10, Exceptions for passengers, crewmembers, and air operators. Paragraph (a)(1) excepts non-radioactive medicinal and toilet articles for personal use, including aerosols, in carry-on and checked baggage, requiring aerosol release devices to be protected against inadvertent release and limiting each person to 2 kg or 2 L in aggregate with no single container over 0.5 kg or 500 mL. law.cornell.edu
Written from federal regulation and from measured catalog data. The hazardous materials figures here are from 49 CFR 175.10 and are current as cited; the carry-on liquids limit is a TSA security requirement that changes without a rulemaking, so check TSA rather than any secondary source including this one. Airlines may also impose their own conditions.