Buy a full case and the price per unit drops automaticallyRequest a sample
AccountCart0
All ContainersBottlesJarsCaps & ClosuresPumps & SprayersTubs & PailsJugsDroppersTinsTubesAccessories
Industries
Learn
Pressure

Closures for pressure

Updated

On this page8
On this shelf the closure choice is the product decision, and the convenient ones are the weaker ones.

The lined screw cap

124 of the 176 closures here are continuous thread. A liner compressed against the land by the thread gives a distributed, mechanically maintained seal, and it is the most pressure-tolerant option on this shelf.

The flip top

Fifteen of them, and they are what customers want: one-handed, no cap to lose. The seal is a small snap fit over an orifice, which is a much smaller area holding the same pressure difference.

The spout

Twenty-five spouted closures. Good for controlled pouring into a smaller container and another small sealing area. For a decant that will be carried rather than used at a sink, it is a comfort choice with a cost.

So the honest recommendation

Ship with a lined screw cap for travel and offer a flip top for home use, or supply both. Selling a flip top as a travel closure without testing it is where the complaints come from.

The liner is doing the work, so specify it

Of the 176 closures, 56 carry an HIS induction-seal liner, 29 a pressure-sensitive liner, 14 F217, 13 PE foam and 13 foam, and 21 carry none at all. A closure with no liner on a thin liquid is the wrong starting point.

An induction seal is a single-use answer

It is an excellent barrier and the customer breaks it on first use, after which the screw cap and its liner are doing everything. For a refillable travel bottle it protects the first journey only.

Torque matters and nobody measures it

A cap run down by hand varies enormously, and an under-torqued cap on a pressure-stressed bottle is the commonest single cause of a leak. For a product you fill yourself, a consistent process is worth more than a better closure.

References

49 CFR 175.10, Exceptions for passengers, crewmembers, and air operators. Paragraph (a)(1) excepts non-radioactive medicinal and toilet articles for personal use, including aerosols, in carry-on and checked baggage, requiring aerosol release devices to be protected against inadvertent release and limiting each person to 2 kg or 2 L in aggregate with no single container over 0.5 kg or 500 mL. law.cornell.edu
29 CFR 1910.1200, Hazard Communication, which sets what a shipped container of a hazardous chemical carries and requires a safety data sheet. law.cornell.edu
Written from federal regulation and from measured catalog data. The hazardous materials figures here are from 49 CFR 175.10 and are current as cited; the carry-on liquids limit is a TSA security requirement that changes without a rulemaking, so check TSA rather than any secondary source including this one. Airlines may also impose their own conditions.