Buy a full case and the price per unit drops automaticallyRequest a sample
AccountCart0
All ContainersBottlesJarsCaps & ClosuresPumps & SprayersTubs & PailsJugsDroppersTinsTubesAccessories
Industries
Learn
What goes wrong

Three leaves are not packaging

Updated

On this page9
Named rather than quietly dropped: three of the nine leaves are not a container question.

What they actually are

Catering bulk, meal prep and takeout are food produced and consumed within hours, carried in disposables. There is no shelf life to engineer and no seal doing safety work.

So the questions are different

Temperature control, holding time, transport time and cross contamination rather than container specification, liner choice or fill temperature. Those are operational controls and they belong to food safety practice rather than to packaging.

And the containers are different too

Hinged clamshells, lidded foodservice containers, soup cups with vented lids. This catalog is retail packaging and does not hold those, and we would rather say so than offer a glass jar for a takeout soup.

A glass jar is actively wrong for takeout

Heavy, breakable, expensive per use, and it has to come back or be thrown away. The economics do not work and the practicalities do not either.

Meal prep is the interesting middle case

A refrigerated meal prep business sold in returnable glass is a real model, and there the jar is a legitimate choice. The distinguishing question is whether the container is returned.

Which is a business model decision

Returnable glass needs a deposit, a collection route and a wash capability. Those are real commitments, and where they exist the container choice becomes ordinary again.

So we name the three and move on

Because a shelf that confidently offers the wrong thing is worse than one that offers nothing, and the other six leaves are where the real content of this property is.

The returnable question is the dividing line

If the container comes back, a glass jar is an ordinary and good choice and meal prep becomes a packaging project. If it does not, the economics and the practicalities both argue against anything on this shelf.

References

21 CFR part 117, the current good manufacturing practice, hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls regulations for human food, which apply alongside the thermal processing rules. law.cornell.edu
Written from federal regulation, not from a production kitchen. Nothing here is a scheduled process, and nothing here is a substitute for a competent processing authority. If you are considering a shelf-stable low-acid product, the first call is to a process authority rather than to a packaging supplier.