Refrigerated or frozen
Updated
On this page9
Why it works
Part 113 and 108.35 are about thermally processed low-acid foods in hermetically sealed containers, aimed at products held under normal nonrefrigerated conditions of storage and distribution. A refrigerated or frozen product is not that.
What you take on instead
A cold chain. Temperature control from your kitchen to the customer, which is an operational and logistical problem rather than a regulatory approval. For a local or farmers market business that is often entirely manageable.
Frozen is the easier of the two
A longer safety margin, far more forgiving of a delay, and it ships with insulation and coolant rather than requiring continuous refrigeration. Most small soup and broth businesses that work are frozen.
The container question changes too
A frozen product needs headspace for expansion and a container that tolerates freezing without cracking. Glass can be used with care and adequate headspace, and this is where asking about freeze tolerance specifically matters.
And labeling has to say so clearly
Keep refrigerated or keep frozen, prominently, because a customer who treats a refrigerated product as shelf stable has defeated the entire basis of the approach. That instruction is a safety control.
Preventive controls still apply
The current good manufacturing practice and risk-based preventive controls rules for human food do not go away. Avoiding part 113 is not avoiding food safety regulation; it is choosing a different and more proportionate part of it.
It is the answer we would give most people
Frozen broth in a glass jar with proper headspace, sold locally or shipped cold, with a clear keep-frozen instruction. That is a real business and it does not need a retort.
It is not a lesser answer
Frozen broth is a real product with a real market, and treating shelf stability as the goal rather than one option is what pushes people toward a regime they cannot operate. Most of the good small producers in this category are frozen.