The check, before anything is formulated
Updated
On this page9
One: what does it do, and what will you say it does?
Kill, repel or mitigate a pest? Treat or prevent a condition? Or clean and groom with no such claim? Those are three different regimes, and the third is the only one that is just a packaging project.
Two: which marking will the finished product carry?
An EPA registration number and establishment number, or an animal drug approval with conforming labeling, or neither. If neither, the product cannot carry a pest or disease claim and the claim is what changes.
Three: is it CBD with a therapeutic claim?
If so, the statute has already characterized it: a new animal drug with no approval in effect is deemed unsafe for that use. That is a question for real advice rather than for a careful label.
Four: does it need to be sterile?
Anything for the eye, anything going into a wound, anything described as sterile. Nothing on these shelves is sterile and no step you can take makes it so. That answer is a stop rather than a specification.
Five: are you repackaging somebody else’s registered or approved product?
Then you need their written permission and, for a pesticide, a registered establishment and a container meeting the refillable container standards. Nothing in our catalog meets the last of those.
Then the ordinary packaging work
Material and liner against the formula, a fitment that matches the dose, a graduated pipette if it is dosed by drop, and a safety data sheet behind the shipped container.
And write the claim rules down for whoever answers customers
Owners ask direct questions about their animals, and the answer given on the phone is a claim. That is the pressure point in this category and the label review never reaches it.
Two of five are stops, and that is deliberate
Most of the checks in this library add work. Two of these end the exercise, which is why they come before the formulation rather than after it, and why this page is the one to read first.