From formula to jar
Updated
On this page8
One: for each color, which listing and which use?
Part 73, 74 or 82, and the specific uses that listing permits. Record the regulation and the use, not a supplier assurance that the colorant is cosmetic grade, which is not a defined term.
Two: is any of it going near the eye?
Using the regulation’s own definition rather than common sense. The eyebrow, the skin below it and the soft tissue inside the infra-orbital ridge are all named, so brow and under-eye products are inside the area even though they are not on the eye.
Three: substantiate the safety
Each ingredient and each finished product, before marketing. The alternative is a conspicuous warning on the principal display panel saying the safety has not been determined, which no business chooses.
Four: build the ingredient declaration
Either strict descending order, or the permitted grouping with color additives last and unordered. If it is a shade range, decide whether the "may contain" route applies and check all four of its conditions.
Five: then find the format
Loose powder in a jar, with the one sifter disc we stock if the neck matches. An emulsion in an airless pump. A pressed pan, a palette or a mascara is not available here and the honest answer is to go elsewhere for the component.
Batch certification, where it applies
Colors subject to certification carry a batch identity behind them, so the certification is a document to hold rather than a property of the name. Ask for it with the listing reference.
Keep the five answers together
Color listings and uses, the eye-area determination, the substantiation file, the declaration form and the format. A new shade reopens the first and usually the fourth.