Buy a full case and the price per unit drops automaticallyRequest a sample
AccountCart0
All ContainersBottlesJarsCaps & ClosuresPumps & SprayersTubs & PailsJugsDroppersTinsTubesAccessories
Industries
Learn
Getting started

Is this for you at all

Updated

On this page8
Every other rule in this library asks for a word or a number. This one forbids a thing.

What this covers

Body butter, body lotion, body oil, body scrub, foot cream, hand cream, massage oil, stretch mark balm and cuticle balm. Nine leaves across two archetypes, which means somebody researched this group rather than stamping one default across it.

The prohibition

It is a prohibited act to manufacture, or to introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce, a rinse-off cosmetic that contains intentionally-added plastic microbeads. Not a labeling requirement, a prohibition.

Defined by size and purpose

A plastic microbead means any solid plastic particle that is less than five millimeters in size and is intended to be used to exfoliate or cleanse the human body or any part thereof. No list of polymers to check against.

And rinse-off is the trigger

A body scrub is rinsed off. A body butter is not. So the identical particle is prohibited in one of your products and outside this paragraph in the next one along the shelf, and the customer’s use is what decides.

Which makes one of the nine leaves the whole question

Body scrub. The other eight are leave-on and this paragraph does not reach them. Whether a plastic particle belongs in a leave-on product is a separate judgment and not a prohibited act.

Toothpaste is named in the statute

The term rinse-off cosmetic includes toothpaste, expressly. So a maker with both a body range and an oral care product has the paragraph reaching both, which is easy to miss.

And the cuticle balm archetype names a tin we do not stock

It sits on the small tin archetype, whose shelf is 47 containers of which 30 are polypropylene and 17 glass, with no metal at all. The catalog does hold 29 tins, and the formats section says so.

References

21 U.S.C. 331(ddd), which prohibits the manufacture or the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of a rinse-off cosmetic containing intentionally-added plastic microbeads, defines a plastic microbead as any solid plastic particle less than five millimeters in size intended to be used to exfoliate or cleanse the human body or any part thereof, and provides that rinse-off cosmetic includes toothpaste. law.cornell.edu
21 CFR 740.10, which requires each ingredient and each finished cosmetic product to be adequately substantiated for safety before marketing, and makes an unsubstantiated one misbranded unless it bears "Warning - The safety of this product has not been determined" on the principal display panel. law.cornell.edu
Written from federal statute and from measured catalog data, not from a formulation bench. Whether a particular particle is a plastic microbead within 21 U.S.C. 331(ddd) is a question about that particle and its purpose. Nothing here is a determination about a specific exfoliant or a specific formula.