From recipe to jar
Updated
On this page9
One: is it for children, or for adults only?
For a foaming product that single decision settles whether the prescribed caution is required. Labeling for use exclusively by adults is the exemption, and it is a market decision rather than a wording one.
And if it is for children, you may add a phrase
For products intended for use by children the regulation permits "except under adult supervision" at the end of the last sentence of the caution. A small permission, and worth using where it fits.
Two: substantiate the safety, per ingredient and per product
Each ingredient and each finished product, before marketing. The alternative is a warning on the principal display panel saying the safety has not been determined, which is not an alternative any business would choose.
Which is the part people skip
Because it is work rather than wording, and because nothing stops you shipping without it except the misbranding consequence. Knowing the rule exists is most of the battle.
Three: choose the container for moisture
A liner that actually seals, a desiccant sized to the headspace, and a jar sized to the fill so there is little air in it. For a reactive product those three are the whole specification.
And the ingredient declaration
A cosmetic in package form carries its ingredients in descending order of predominance. On a small jar that competes for space with the caution and the directions, so the label has to be laid out rather than assembled.
Keep the three answers together
Audience, substantiation file, and the container and liner choice. Changing the audience changes the label; changing the formula reopens the substantiation and often the moisture behavior too.
The audience decision comes first for a reason
It is the only one of the three that changes which rule applies rather than how well you satisfy it. Formulating and then deciding who the product is for means designing a label twice.