The count is the trigger
Updated
On this page9
The arithmetic
Elemental iron per unit, multiplied by the number of units in the package. That is the whole calculation, and it is why a bottle-size decision is a compliance decision.
At an 18 mg dose
Fourteen units is 252 mg, which is over. Thirty is 540 mg. Sixty is 1,080 mg. One hundred and eighty is 3,240 mg, nearly thirteen times the threshold. There is no ordinary count that stays under.
At a smaller dose the picture changes
A 5 mg supporting dose reaches 250 mg at fifty units, so a 30-count bottle is under and a 60-count is over. That is exactly the case where a range has two different answers in it.
Which is correct and looks inconsistent
One size requiring child-resistant packaging and another not is the rule working as written. Treating the range as a single regulatory object is the mistake, and the instinct to make it consistent is the wrong instinct.
The concentration test can rescue you, or not
Both tests have to be met. A product with a very low iron concentration by weight can carry a large package total and still fall outside, so run both rather than stopping at the first.
The powder exception is worth knowing
Powdered preparations at no more than 0.12 percent weight-to-weight elemental iron are excepted. A powder and a capsule of the same formula are therefore not in the same position, which can inform the format choice.
Recompute on every size extension
A new count is a new package total. It feels like a packaging change rather than a formula change, which is precisely why the calculation does not get run.
Work it out on paper before you choose the bottle
Five minutes with a calculator tells you whether any of your intended counts sits near the threshold, and that is the moment the bottle decision is still free. After tooling and a case quantity it is not.